In this weeks blog I’m going to be comparing The Perks Of Being A Wallflower book to the film. Let me know in the comments which you prefer.
I immediately watched the film after I had read the book; this may have been a mistake because all I could think was: this didn’t happen in the book; they’ve missed this out. Although some parts of the book were missing (like his sister being pregnant), you can expect this from films because you can’t fit everything from the book in it.
I thought that Logan Lerman did a fantastic job portraying Charlie and I loved seeing Paul Rudd as Bill (although he’s called Mr. Anderson in the film and Charlie does’t get invited over for tea in the film). I thought they picked a great cast and my favourite has to be Patrick, played by Ezra Miller. If you haven’t seen the film, I suggest you read the book first so that the characters don’t become the actors in your head.
I like to read the book before I see the movie so that I can read the book without it being ruined. Although the film did do the book some justice (after all, it was directed by Chbosky himself) I still preferred the book because there was a lot more detail. If you’ve seen the film before reading the book I think you’d be left with some questions.
One thing that’s different in the film is that Sam and Charlie seem to be together, whereas in the book it’s pretty much left down to “we’ll see what happens” and “we’ll write to each other.” There are a lot of things that bother me about the ending; does Charlie feel better? Does he make new friends? He was starting to be okay again and now it’s all come crashing down. Will I know what happened to him? How did he become depressed? There are so many unanswered questions; but that’s just like life. Everything is a cliffhanger.
If you’ve read the book or seen the film or both, let me know in the comments what your thoughts are and which version you prefer. Until next time, love, Vee x